Original Research ArticleInternational Journal of Pharmaceutical InvestigationVol. 8 | Issue 2 | 2018 | pp. 100–105Open access
Evaluation of efficacy and safety of Ayucid capsule in subjects suffering from chronic symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux disease
- 1*,
- 2,
- 3,
- 4,
- 3,
- 4,
- 1
- 1 Department of Medical Research, Target Institute of Medical Education and Research, Mumbai.
- 2 Department of Rasashastra and Bhaishajya Kalpana, Ayurveda Research Centre, Ayurved Seva Sangh, Nashik.
- 3 Department of Kayachikitsa, PDEA’s College of Ayurveda and Research Centre, Pune.
- 4 Department of Kayachikitsa, KVTR Ayurvedic College, Boradi, Maharashtra, INDIA.
Published in International Journal of Pharmaceutical Investigation
Correspondence: Sanjay M. Tamoli
Department of Medical Research, Target Institute of Medical Education and Research, Mumbai.
Email: sanjaytamoli@hotmail.com
Copyright: © 2018 Manuscript Technomedia. This is an open access article.
- Published:
- Apr 1, 2018
How to cite
Tamoli, S. M., Pande, S. P., Deshpande, S. V., Mundhe, N. B., Doiphode, M. V., Kolhe, G. S., & Upasani, S. A. (2018). Evaluation of efficacy and safety of Ayucid capsule in subjects suffering from chronic symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux disease. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Investigation, 8(2), 100–105. https://doi.org/10.4103/jphi.JPHI_35_18
Abstract
Objectives: The objective of the study was to assess the efficacy and safety of Ayucid capsule and Omeprazole 20 mg in patients suffering from chronic symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Materials and Methods: It was an open‑label, randomized, comparative, multicenter, prospective clinical study. Subjects in Ayucid group were advised to consume two Ayucid capsules twice daily orally before meals, and subjects in Omeprazole group were advised to consume one Omeprazole (20 mg) capsule orally before lunch for 28 days. All P values were reported based on two‑sided significance test, and all the statistical tests were interpreted at 5% level of significance. Results: A total of 63 subjects (33 in Ayucid group and 30 in Omeprazole group) completed the study. At the end of the study, the number of cases of heartburn and symptom of heartburn and severity scores of acid regurgitation, dysphasia, and nausea reduced significantly (P < 0.05) in both the study groups. Significant relief in symptoms such as epigastric pain, loss of appetite, bloating of stomach, constipation, and gaseous distension was observed in both the groups. Majority of subjects showed significant (P < 0.05) reduction in GERD health‑related quality of life subscores and improvement in overall efficacy in both the groups. No posttreatment significant (P > 0.05) changes were observed in safety laboratory parameters and vitals. Of the reported adverse events in the two groups, none were found to be related to the study drugs. Conclusion: Ayucid capsule is equally effective or noninferior to that of Omeprazole capsule in relieving the GERD symptoms.
Keywords
Subject
Article metadata
| Title | Evaluation of efficacy and safety of Ayucid capsule in subjects suffering from chronic symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux disease |
|---|---|
| Authors | Sanjay M. Tamoli; Shishir P. Pande; Shailesh V. Deshpande; Narendra B. Mundhe; Mandar V. Doiphode; Ganesh S. Kolhe; Sachin A. Upasani |
| Affiliations | Department of Medical Research, Target Institute of Medical Education and Research, Mumbai.; Department of Rasashastra and Bhaishajya Kalpana, Ayurveda Research Centre, Ayurved Seva Sangh, Nashik.; Department of Kayachikitsa, PDEA’s College of Ayurveda and Research Centre, Pune.; Department of Kayachikitsa, KVTR Ayurvedic College, Boradi, Maharashtra, INDIA. |
| Corresponding author | sanjaytamoli@hotmail.com |
| Journal | International Journal of Pharmaceutical Investigation |
| Volume / Issue | Vol. 8, Issue 2 (2018) |
Also in this issue
- Usnic acid‑loaded bioinspired heparin modified‑cellulose acetate phthalate nanoparticle(s) as an efficient carrier for site‑specific delivery in lung cancer cellspp. 53–62
- In vivo evaluation of the aromatase inhibition by 4‑((1H‑imidazol‑1‑yl) methyl)‑2‑(4‑fluorophenyl)‑ 8‑phenylquinolinepp. 63–68
- Distinguishing adverse drug reactions, the noxious effects of medicines at a tertiary care hospitalpp. 69–73
- Mesalamine-loaded mucoadhesive microsphere for colon drug delivery system: Effect of process variables and in vitro characterizationpp. 74–82
- Development and investigation of novel solid self‑nanoemulsifying system loaded with hydrochlorothiazide for the treatment of hypertensionpp. 83–91
Readers Also Viewed
Effect of the Fractions of Coccinia grandis on Ethanol- Induced Cerebral Oxidative Stress in Rats
M. Umamaheswari, T. K. Chatterjee
Jan 1, 2009
Phytochemical Screening and Antioxidant Activity Evaluation of Selected Philippine Fruit Peels and Pulps
Mildred Dagcuta Pates, Angelo Mark Po Walag, Romeo M. Del Rosario
Aug 17, 2026
Impact of Artificial Intelligence Assisted Drug Therapy Optimization on Drug Related Problems Amongst Older Adult Patients: A Systematic Review
Jehath Syed, Christy Thomas, Bavneet Kaur
Oct 23, 2026