Research ArticleJournal of Scientometric ResearchVol. 4 | Issue 2 | 2015 | pp. 96–103Open access
Scientometric study of global electron probe microanalysis literature
- 1*,
- 1,
- 1
- 1 Scientific Information Resource Division, Knowledge Management Group, Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, Mumbai, Maharashtra, INDIA.
Published in Journal of Scientometric Research
Correspondence: Anil Sagar
Scientific Information Resource Division, Knowledge Management Group, Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, Mumbai, Maharashtra, INDIA.
Email: asagar@barc.gov.in
Copyright: © 2015 Manuscript Technomedia. This is an open access article.
- Published:
- May 1, 2015
How to cite
Sagar, A., Kademani, B. S., & Bhanumurthy, K. (2015). Scientometric study of global electron probe microanalysis literature. Journal of Scientometric Research, 4(2), 96–103. https://doi.org/10.4103/2320-0057.167251
Abstract
This paper attempts to highlight the quantitative and qualitative growth and development of the literature on electron probe microanalysis in terms of publication output as per Web of Science (1992–2013) database. A total of 6853 publications and 60,958 citations to these publications were received. The average number of publications published per year was 311.50. The highest number of publications (436) was published in 2013. The highest number of citations (4266) was received in 2004. The average citations per publication were 8.90 and the average impact factor per publication was 1.44. The collaboration trend is toward multi‑authored publications. Majority of the countries prefer to work in a large group in this field. Japan topped the list with 1674 publications followed by People’s Republic of China with 1390 publications, USA with 538 publications, Germany with 499 publications, France with 460 publications, the South Korea with 405 publications, and India with 379 publications. The highest number of publications was published in Materials Sciences with 2763 publications, followed by Chemical Sciences with 1529 and Engineering Sciences. The highly productive institutions were: Chinese Academy of Sciences People’s Republic of China followed by Tohoku University, Japan, Shandong University, People’s Republic of China, University of Antwerp, Belgium and University of Tokyo, Japan.
Keywords
Subject
Article metadata
| Title | Scientometric study of global electron probe microanalysis literature |
|---|---|
| Authors | Anil Sagar; Basavaraj Shivappa Kademani; Karanam Bhanumurthy |
| Affiliations | Scientific Information Resource Division, Knowledge Management Group, Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, Mumbai, Maharashtra, INDIA. |
| Corresponding author | asagar@barc.gov.in |
| Journal | Journal of Scientometric Research |
| Volume / Issue | Vol. 4, Issue 2 (2015) |
Also in this issue
- Editorialpp. 46–47
- The influence of peer reviewers as literacy brokers on the construction of texts for publication in ISI-indexed journals: A study of medical research articlespp. 48–60
- From Streptococcus lactis to Lactococcus lactis: A qualitative and quantitative analysis of the scope of research undertaken around a microbial conceptpp. 61–69
- A new ranking scheme for the institutional scientific performancepp. 70–76
- Analysis of occupational demand for patent agents in China ‑ Based on the network data of recruitmentpp. 77–84
Readers Also Viewed
Development and Validation of UV/visible Spectrophotometric Method for Estimation of Piroxicam from Bulk and Formulation
Sandip Mohan Honmane, Kunal Rajaram Yadav, Yuvraj Dilip Dange
Apr 23, 2025
Effects of Artificial Intelligence on Academic Performance of Library and Information Science University Students: A Meta-Analysis (2023-2025)
Kayode Sunday John Dada
Aug 6, 2026
Bridging Innovation and Impact: A Multidisciplinary Approach to Contemporary Research Challenges
Mueen Ahmed KK
Aug 11, 2026