EditorialPharmacognosy CommunicationsVol. 9 | Issue 2 | 2019 | pp. 38–38Open access
Editorial
- 1,2*
- 1 Environmental Futures Research Institute, Nathan Campus, Griffith University, 170 Kessels Rd, Nathan, Brisbane, Queensland, AUSTRALIA.
- 2 School of Natural Sciences, Nathan Campus, Griffith University, 170 Kessels Rd, Nathan, Brisbane, Queensland, AUSTRALIA.
Published in Pharmacognosy Communications
Correspondence: Ian Edwin Cock
Environmental Futures Research Institute, Nathan Campus, Griffith University, 170 Kessels Rd, Nathan, Brisbane, Queensland, AUSTRALIA.; School of Natural Sciences, Nathan Campus, Griffith University, 170 Kessels Rd, Nathan, Brisbane, Queensland, AUSTRALIA.
Email: I.Cock@griffith.edu.au
Copyright: © 2019 Manuscript Technomedia. This is an open access article.
- Published:
- Apr 24, 2019
- DOI:
- 10.5530/pc.2019.2.9
How to cite
Cock, I. E. (2019). Editorial. Pharmacognosy Communications, 9(2), 38. https://doi.org/10.5530/pc.2019.2.9
Abstract
Two other studies examined the antibacterial properties of the Australian plant species Callistemon linearis Schrad. and J.C. Wendl. and Mischarytera lauteriana (F.M. Bailey) respectively. Similarly, another study examined the antimicrobial and antioxidant activities of Prosopis cineraria, an important plant in Indian medicinal systems. The final study included in this issue reports that Piper novae-hollandiae Miq. leaf extracts lack antibacterial activity. Whilst this is a negative result, it is interesting as closely related plant species often share similar secondary metabolites and bioactivities. Indeed, the genus Piper has a long history of medicinal usage in many areas of the world and many Piper spp. have therapeutic properties, including antibacterial bioactivities. Thus, this species was considered a good candidate for antibacterial activity screening. The publication of negative results such as this are important so that valuable time and resources are not wasted by other groups repeating these tests.
Subject
Article metadata
| Title | Editorial |
|---|---|
| Authors | Ian Edwin Cock |
| Affiliations | Environmental Futures Research Institute, Nathan Campus, Griffith University, 170 Kessels Rd, Nathan, Brisbane, Queensland, AUSTRALIA.; School of Natural Sciences, Nathan Campus, Griffith University, 170 Kessels Rd, Nathan, Brisbane, Queensland, AUSTRALIA. |
| Corresponding author | I.Cock@griffith.edu.au |
| Journal | Pharmacognosy Communications |
| Volume / Issue | Vol. 9, Issue 2 (2019) |
Also in this issue
- Callistemon linearis Schrad. and J.C. Wendl. Extracts Inhibit the Growth of Gram-Positive Bacteria but have no Effect on Gram Negative Bacteriapp. 39–46
- The Inhibitory Activity of Mischarytera lauteriana (F.M.Bailey) Leaf Extracts against a Panel of Bacterial Pathogenspp. 47–53
- Characterization of the, Antimicrobial, Antioxidant Activity of Proteins from Prosopis cineraria Leavespp. 54–58
- Rapid Screening using GIBEX Screens-to-nature System of Ethnomedicinal Plants from Ngong Forest, Kenya for Potency against Infectious Diseases and Antioxidant Activities: A Qualitative Studypp. 59–74
- Piper novae-hollandiae Miq. Leaf Extracts Lack Antibacterial Activity and are non-toxic in vitropp. 75–79
Readers Also Viewed
Development and Validation of UV/visible Spectrophotometric Method for Estimation of Piroxicam from Bulk and Formulation
Sandip Mohan Honmane, Kunal Rajaram Yadav, Yuvraj Dilip Dange
Apr 23, 2025
Effects of Artificial Intelligence on Academic Performance of Library and Information Science University Students: A Meta-Analysis (2023-2025)
Kayode Sunday John Dada
Aug 6, 2026
Bridging Innovation and Impact: A Multidisciplinary Approach to Contemporary Research Challenges
Mueen Ahmed KK
Aug 11, 2026