Letter to the EditorPharmacognosy ReviewsVol. 20 | Issue 40 | 2026 | pp. 178–179Open access
Periodizing Antioxidant Intake: Why “Recovery” and “Adaptation” Phases Need Different Advice
- 1*
- 1 Manuscript Technomedia LLP, No. 22 (New No. 40), 3rd Cross, Vivekananda Nagar, Bengaluru, Karnataka, INDIA.
Published in Pharmacognosy Reviews
Correspondence: Mueen Ahmed KK
Manuscript Technomedia LLP, No. 22 (New No. 40), 3rd Cross, Vivekananda Nagar, Bengaluru, Karnataka, INDIA.
Email: mueen.ahmed@gmail.com
Copyright: © 2026 Manuscript Technomedia. This is an open access article.
- Published:
- Aug 3, 2026
How to cite
KK, M. A. (2026). Periodizing Antioxidant Intake: Why “Recovery” and “Adaptation” Phases Need Different Advice. Pharmacognosy Reviews, 20(40), 178–179. https://doi.org/10.5530/phrev.20260005
Abstract
Debate over whether athletes should take antioxidant supplements often proceeds as though a single answer must apply at all times. I write to suggest that the more useful question is not whether, but when—and that antioxidant advice should be periodized to the training phase. According to PubMed, antioxidant supplementation can blunt the redox-sensitive signaling—through pathways such as MAPK and PGC-1α—that drives mitochondrial biogenesis and other adaptations to training, which argues against routine high-dose use during phases where adaptation is the goal. The reactive oxygen species generated by exercise are, in this sense, part of the training stimulus rather than simply a cost. Yet the same compounds may have a legitimate role at other times. According to PubMed, a review of tart cherry juice in athletes found that its polyphenols can lessen pain and accelerate strength recovery while reducing inflammation and oxidative stress, and explicitly noted that such supplementation may not be optimal during the adaptation or build phase but may be beneficial when recovery between intense competitions is the priority. The benefit and the harm depend on the phase.
Subject
Article metadata
| Title | Periodizing Antioxidant Intake: Why “Recovery” and “Adaptation” Phases Need Different Advice |
|---|---|
| Authors | Mueen Ahmed KK |
| Affiliations | Manuscript Technomedia LLP, No. 22 (New No. 40), 3rd Cross, Vivekananda Nagar, Bengaluru, Karnataka, INDIA. |
| Corresponding author | mueen.ahmed@gmail.com |
| Journal | Pharmacognosy Reviews |
| Volume / Issue | Vol. 20, Issue 40 (2026) |
Also in this issue
- An Updated Review on the Diverse Therapeutic Potential of Calendula officinalis L.pp. 102–109
- Bioelectrical and Neurochemical Modulation by Peganum harmala: A Narrative Review of its Role in Neural Hyperactivity, Stress Circuitry, and Cortical Excitabilitypp. 110–122
- Anti-inflammatory study of Zingiber officinale (Ginger): A Systematic Reviewpp. 123–130
- A Review on Pharmacological Studies and Phytochemistry of Aegle marmelos (L.) Correapp. 131–140
- Antioxidant Status of Natural Products in Neurodegenerative Disorders: A Comprehensive Reviewpp. 141–153
Readers Also Viewed
Effect of the Fractions of Coccinia grandis on Ethanol- Induced Cerebral Oxidative Stress in Rats
M. Umamaheswari, T. K. Chatterjee
Jan 1, 2009
Phytochemical Screening and Antioxidant Activity Evaluation of Selected Philippine Fruit Peels and Pulps
Mildred Dagcuta Pates, Angelo Mark Po Walag, Romeo M. Del Rosario
Aug 17, 2026
Impact of Artificial Intelligence Assisted Drug Therapy Optimization on Drug Related Problems Amongst Older Adult Patients: A Systematic Review
Jehath Syed, Christy Thomas, Bavneet Kaur
Oct 23, 2026